Class Risk Perception and Communication

   

Not applicable

1.   Risk assessment vs. risk perception 1.1 Differences between experts vs. citizens in risk assessment; 1.2 Psychometric risk paradigm; 1.3 Analytical vs. intuitive processing of risk information. 2. Factors that influence risk perception 3. Risk communication 3.1 Risk analysis process: from risk assessment to risk communication; 3.2 The basic communication model vs. the risk communication model; 3.3 Information management and public communication in emergencies; 3.4 Types of mass communication: the role of the media in diffusing a crisis situation; conditioning information; the role of civil protection agents.  

Teaching is based on classroom work, independent study, and bibliographic research. The instructor presents and discusses content, applying it to real situations. Tutorials support out-of-class work. Students engage in topic discussions, solve exercises, and complete assignments outside class. Support materials are provided, and students are encouraged to consult additional sources. A practical assignment promotes autonomy, self-learning, and communication, including an oral presentation and defense.

Amri, A.,   Lassa, J.A.; Tebe, Y.,  Hanifa, N.R.;  Kumar, J., Sagala, S. (2022). Pathways to disaster risk reduction education integration in schools: insights from SPAB evaluation in Indonesia. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc., 73,102860. Balog-Way, D., McComas, K. and Besley, J. (2020). The Evolving Field of Risk Communication. Risk Analysis (40), 2240-2262. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13615 Jovarauskaite, L. and Böhm, G. (2020). The Emotional Engagement of Climate Experts Is Related to Their Climate Change Perceptions and Coping Strategies. J. Risk Res. p.1-17. Nunes, A., Martins, B., Azevedo, M. (2020). Exploring the Spatial Perception of Risk in Portugal by Students of Geography, Journal of Geography, 119:5, 171-182, DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2020.1801803. Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The Risk Perception Paradox – Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards. Risk Analysis, (33), 1049-1065.