filmeu

Class Risk Cartography II

  • Presentation

    Presentation

    Risk Cartography is recognised for its unavoidable contribution to the process of knowledge and research, for its role as a differentiating element in the profile of Civil Protection risk mapping as an essential instrument in the practice of territorial planning.
  • Code

    Code

    ULP2600-17010
  • Syllabus

    Syllabus

    1. Technological processes. 1.1. Modeling methods of technological risk. 1.2. The evaluation and categorization of technological risk. 2. Mixed risks 2.1 Forest fires. 2.2. Forest fire risk mapping 3. Mapping vulnerability and risk mapping. Assessing the degree of loss and potential damage. 4. Evaluation of specific risk and
  • Objectives

    Objectives

    Course objectives are: To understand several technological and mixed hazards mapping methods Develop skills related to the identification of hazard areas Integrate information on the dynamics of the physical environment with hazard identification Technological and mixed risk modelling in GIS Introduce the risk problem in emergency planning In addition to strengthening of skills for analysis and synthesis, organization and planning, autonomous learning and adaptability to new situations by applying critical thinking and teachings received at the end of the semester the student should be able to: Know and apply several technological and mixed hazard mapping methods Develop skills related to the identification of hazard areas Relate the dynamics of the physical environment with hazard identification Understand the dynamics of physical environment, integrating it into GIS - Articulate hazards with emergency planning processes Produce technological and mixed hazard maps.
  • Teaching methodologies and assessment

    Teaching methodologies and assessment

    In the context of class, exercises are carried out with different methodologies for constructing risk cartography for various harmful processes, contributing to the broad knowledge of multiple methodologies. Practical work is carried out in groups. This should consider (i) the current state of knowledge on the subject under analysis, objectives and methodologies to be developed; (ii) the methodology developed, presentation and discussion of results and respective risk mapping. ASSESSMENT: Semi-annual, continuous type, according to the ULP Knowledge Assessment Regulation. The continuous type assessment without final exam consists of two written tests (each 25%) to take place during the school year and a practical assignment (which requires a defense of work) (50%). 
  • References

    References

    Altan, O.; Backhaus, R.; Boccardo, P.; Zlatanova, S. (Eds.); Geoinformation for Disaster and Risk Management. Examples and Best Practices, 2010. ISBN: 978-87-90907-88-4 Bruno Barroca & Damien Serre (2018) Risks revealed by cartography - cartography renewed by the geovisualization of risks, International Journal of Cartography, 4:1, 1-3, DOI: 10.1080/23729333.2018.1444376 Ekmekciolu, O.; Koc, K.; Özger, M. (2022). Towards flood risk mapping based on multi-tiered decision making in a densely urbanized metropolitan city of Istanbul, Sustainable Cities and Society, Volume 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103759. Minucci, G.; Molinari, D.; Gemini, G.; Pezzoli, S. (2020). Enhancing flood risk maps by a participatory and collaborative design process, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Volume 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101747 Smith, K. ; Environmental hazards, Routledge, 2000. ISBN: 0-415-22464-0 
SINGLE REGISTRATION
Lisboa 2020 Portugal 2020 Small financiado eu 2024 prr 2024 republica portuguesa 2024 Logo UE Financed Provedor do Estudante Livro de reclamaões Elogios