filmeu

Class Aesthetics II

  • Presentation

    Presentation

    This UC aims to inform and develop the capacity for critical and aesthetic thinking about the world and art.
  • Code

    Code

    ULHT722-3164
  • Syllabus

    Syllabus

    The main concepts of Aesthetics: Beautiful Ugly Sublime Horrible Tragic Comedy Sinister Art and thought Aesthetics Art science Theory of Art Philosophy of art Art criticism  
  • Objectives

    Objectives

    a) to know the meaning of ¿aesthetic¿ as a concept; b) to distinguish aesthetic, arte theory, science of art and philosophy of art; c) to know what is a Judgment of Taste d) to acknowledge the historical periods of aesthetic judgment; e) to identify the human faculties concerned with aesthetic judgment; f) to frame a proper definition of art; g) to acknowledge criticism as a creative principle; h) to be to frame an object as an ¿art object¿; i) to acknowledge the main aesthetic categories; j) to recognize the value of ¿art¿ in Western Cultures; k) to acknowledge the critical historical periods of the function of art and aesthetics; l) to acknowledge art in its visual, sound, literary and conceptual constituent; m) to be able to produce a critical judgment on she/he own creative process; n) to stand a position in the possible meanings of ¿creativity¿. o) to be able to produce a coherent discourse on an ¿art object¿.
  • Teaching methodologies and assessment

    Teaching methodologies and assessment

    Being a course with a theoretical nature, with essentially theory driven outcomes and skills, master classes are in itself the most appropriate methodology. The survey of problems, its definition and discussion are the main elements to be used. The textual heuristics and hermeneutics are also resources to improve in class. The verification and monitoring of skills acquisition is done by a public discussion of the argument chosen for the oral presentation, i.e., around problem raised by the student Assessment: it will have two moments, one qualitative, the other quantitative. The qualitative moment will be tested on student attendance to class and their participation, and with a practical exercise focused on a topic-problem argumentation on one syllabus subject matter. Writing a scientific paper on the previous chosen topic-problem will be the element of quantitative evaluation. Weigh: Attendance : 10%; Oral presentation : 40%; Final Examination : 50%.
  • References

    References

    BENJAMIN, W. (2006). A obra de arte na época da sua possibilidade de reprodução técnica. In A Modernidade. (207-241). Lisboa: Assírio & Alvim. BOZAL, V. (1999). Historia de las ideas estéticas y de las teorías artísticas contemporáneas. Madrid: António Machado. GREENBERG, C. (1961). Art and Culture. Boston: Beacon Press. HERNÁNDEZ, D. (2012). A comédia do sublime. Lisboa: Vega. MOLDER, M. F. (2009). Símbolo, Analogia e Afinidade. Lisboa: Vendaval. POCHAT, G. (2008), Historia de la estética y la teoría del arte. De la Antigüedad al siglo XIX. SEDLMAYR, H. (2008). A revolução da arte moderna. Lisboa: Livros do Brasil. VENTURI, L. (2007). História da crítica de arte. Lisboa: Edções 70.
SINGLE REGISTRATION
Lisboa 2020 Portugal 2020 Small financiado eu 2024 prr 2024 republica portuguesa 2024 Logo UE Financed Provedor do Estudante Livro de reclamaões Elogios