filmeu

Class Risk Cartography I

  • Presentation

    Presentation

    Risk Cartography is recognized for its unavoidable contribution in the knowledge and investigation process, for its role as a differentiating element in the profile of Civil Protection professionals, as well as for its strategic focus on the enhancement of Risk Cartography as an essential tool in the practice of spatial planning.
  • Code

    Code

    ULP2600-17006
  • Syllabus

    Syllabus

    Analysis of the spatial and temporal dimension of risk Conceptual models in risk theory. Natural risk and anthropic risk Natural processes and risk mapping Geomorphological processes and susceptibility Cartography supported by statistical-based models and physical-based models Mapping vulnerability and risk mapping.  Assessment of the degree of loss and potential damage Assessment of specific risk and total risk Cartography, prevention, perception and spatial planning
  • Objectives

    Objectives

    Understand methodologies and techniques for mapping. Understand the risk mapping methodologies Identify risk areas Integrate information about the dynamics of the physical environment with risk identification Organize information in Geographic Information Systems (GIS).
  • Teaching methodologies and assessment

    Teaching methodologies and assessment

    In the context of class, exercises are carried out with different methodologies for constructing risk cartography for various harmful processes, contributing to the broad knowledge of multiple methodologies. Practical work is carried out in groups. This should consider (i) the current state of knowledge on the subject under analysis, objectives and methodologies to be developed; (ii) the methodology developed, presentation and discussion of results and respective risk mapping. ASSESSMENT: Semi-annual, continuous type, according to the ULP Knowledge Assessment Regulation. The continuous type assessment without final exam consists of two written tests (each 25%) to take place during the school year and a practical assignment (which requires a defense of work). 
  • References

    References

    Altan, O.; Backhaus, R.; Boccardo, P.; Zlatanova, S. (Eds.); Geoinformation for Disaster and Risk Management. Examples and Best Practices, 2010. ISBN: 978-87-90907-88-4 Bruno Barroca & Damien Serre (2018) Risks revealed by cartography ? cartography renewed by the geovisualization of risks, International Journal of Cartography, 4:1, 1-3, DOI: 10.1080/23729333.2018.1444376 Ekmekciolu, O.; Koc, K.; Özger, M. (2022). Towards flood risk mapping based on multi-tiered decision making in a densely urbanized metropolitan city of Istanbul, Sustainable Cities and Society, Volume 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103759. Minucci, G.; Molinari, D.; Gemini, G.; Pezzoli, S. (2020). Enhancing flood risk maps by a participatory and collaborative design process, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Volume 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101747 Smith, K. ; Environmental hazards, Routledge, 2000. ISBN: 0-415-22464-0  
SINGLE REGISTRATION
Lisboa 2020 Portugal 2020 Small financiado eu 2024 prr 2024 republica portuguesa 2024 Logo UE Financed Provedor do Estudante Livro de reclamaões Elogios